Showing posts with label David Fincher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Fincher. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (2011)

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is a bit of a curious film to me; I saw the original Swedish film during 2010's summer and found it to be a completely engrossing thriller, with a mystery that got more perverted the deeper you looked into it. Audiences, whether they like to admit it or not, are obviously fascinated by anti-heroes, extreme rebels, social outcasts, which can only begin to explain why the late Stieg Larsson's Millennium trilogy (as it has been dubbed) is such a huge hit over here in the states.

Certainly this tale is tailor made for its director, David Fincher, who revels in tales of social misfits and anti-system messages. His Fight Club is one of the ultimate "stick it to the man" films, ending in the destruction of America's financial sector. And I'm sure he was drawn to the material, if only so he could bring the character of Lisbeth Salander (Rooney Mara) to life. She is the ultimate Fincher heroine, with piercings, tattoos, and wacky hairdo, not to mention an independent streak that sets her apart from almost any other heroine in film.

Daniel Craig also stars as the film's other protagonist, Mikael Blomkvist, editor of Millennium magazine (where the trilogy no doubt draws its name), who has fallen under a scandal and lost his life savings because of an unfounded allegation he made against a fellow magazine mogul. Labeled with libel, he is whisked to northern Sweden where, on a remote island populated by a wealthy but estranged family, he is asked to investigate the murder of one of their members some forty years ago.

Lisbeth and Mikael stay separated for over an hour of the film as he begins uncovering a string of possibly related women murders, and she has an unfortunate run-in with a piggish social worker who will release Lisbeth's money to her in exchange for favors. Eventually they collide and the film focuses fully on the murders, though one wonders how much this will connect with Harriet.

The original title of the book and Swedish film is Män som hatar kvinnor which translates to Men who hate women. It's an apt title, considering all the content, though a film with that heading would never get recognition in the states (or a book for that matter) and the retitling is a bit more intriguing (though we never do learn the significance of that dragon tattoo). The film has an incredibly brutal rape scene and sex scenes that would have earned an independent feature an NC-17, but such is the Hollywood system that of course this skated by. Maybe its a sign of maturity on the MPAA's half that we can handle more extreme content, but then I remember Shame has an NC-17 rating.

But here's the thing: the film is almost identical to the 2009 Swedish one. Oh sure, it has a bigger budget, a more assured director, and a fantastic cast, not to mention a dynamite opening credits scene with a cover of Led Zeppelin's Immigrant Song that was quite the hit back when the trailer first dropped. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, who won Oscars for their unique and haunting score for The Social Network (2010) return as composers, but it feels like more of the same. Their style of music certainly lends itself well to the unease that surrounds this film, but at the same time I couldn't help but think back to The Social Network and its score.

There is also a structural problem with the film. It opens with Mikael's problems at Millennium, then introduces with the missing girl Harriet, then introduces with the string of women murders. Then each one of these threads is resolved from the murders on back, but the film suffers in the resolution between Mikael and his foes at the rival magazine. It's a protracted denouement that drags on and on after Harriet's plot is resolved, when we have little interest in what's going on.

The film just feels pointless. The Swedish version was thrilling and engrossed me, and this version felt like the same thing but in English. It's a sign of how lazy we are that we won't see the foreign language version because we don't like reading our movies (though anyone who got through the book should have no problem with subtitles). I feel even Fincher reflects this notion: he doesn't feel like he's trying here, like he simply watched the Swedish one and said, "Well, they did a good enough job, so I'll just make the same version in English, make millions, and call it day." Which I don't fault him for.

The performances are great, especially Rooney Mara as Lisbeth, but I also feel like they aren't too different from their Swedish counterparts. If I had to pick who was better, Noomi Rapace or Rooney Mara, I would have to go with Rapace because Mara's performance is clearly modeled on hers.

Anyone who doesn't know the material will surely be entertained, but anyone coming back to see if anything new was done will be disappointed. It's as pointless as watching Let Me In, the remake of Let the Right One In. At least when Seven Samurai was remade in America, they changed the story to cowboys so it felt fresh (though American samurais are something that wouldn't work anyway). I don't mind a remake if it does something new with the material, or approaches the subject from a different angle. True Grit was hailed as superior to the John Wayne version, though that also may be because forty years means something new can be done with the material.

I'm just tired of these pointless remakes. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Which reminds me of Gus Van Sant's shot-for-shot remake of Psycho. He was asked to remake it, so he did. There was very little wrong with that film, and it never felt dated, so Van Sant figured it would be the easiest thing to do. He had the right idea.

Monday, January 31, 2011

Top 10 of 2010

And here we are, once again, at that annual of annual traditions where one looks back over what was offered the prior year and evaluates what will indeed live on, for them, as a fantastic film. Of course all these lists were released in December, right? Well, yes, for the critics who get to see everything well in advance and are able to publish these lists. But I am just a common moviegoer, and must wait to see that latest foreign film or simply catch-up (as is the case this year) with films I missed because I was busy with life. But now I have seen the year's offerings and I can say that this turned out to be a better year then I initially thought. But before I release my top ten, I'd like to start off by naming the worst movie of the year:

And the worst movie of 2010 is...

The Human Centipede: First Sequence (2009)
It's grotesque, disgusting and pointless. Actually, I would half admire it if it lived up to its claim of depravity, but once you get past the idea of the premise, it is not a hard movie to swallow and becomes more frustrating with every dimwitted decision made by the principal females. The doctor (played by Dieter Laser) is very creepy, but the rest of the movie is unmemorable and doesn't even make the impact on you it wants too.

Sorry, I just figured it would be better to get the filth out of the way. Now, on to the top 10 of the year 2010!

10. The American
This is oddly one of the most underrated films of the year, as critics and the general public alike seemed to be taken aback by this movie. What most people were expecting, I suspect, is an exciting actioneer starring George Clooney. What we get instead is a mostly quiet film about a hitman who must live his life in solitude (the opening scene alone defies hitmen convention). Clooney acts like a samurai for most of the film, as he hides in a remote Italian village building a gun for a final job. The ensemble is quite strong, and while the movies last moments are a bit telegraphed, the preceding build-up makes the whole film worth it.

9. The King's Speech
It seems like this will surely win the Oscar for everything now, and I'm not unhappy about this prospect. The King's Speech is a terrific film with a great ensemble (Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush and Helena Bonham Carter, along with the likes of Michael Gambon, Guy Pearce and Timothy Spall), telling the story of King George VI's rise to power and how he had to overcome his stammer to inspire his people to be strong during war. The film works because of the actors, especially Geoffrey Rush who breathes so much life into dialectical coach Lionel Logue. Its a film that inspires you and makes you happy, and we need that every now and then.

8. Animal Kingdom
I had the pleasure of viewing this film with a fiery latin beat thumping through the floors from our neighbors. But that did not alter this film's quality in the slightest (though I have never heard Surfin' U.S.A. played at a more inappropriate time). An Australian film about a teen whose mother dies and is forced to live with his uncles and grandmother, who also just happen to be a mafia-type family. Its a taut film that spends a fair amount of time establishing itself before it really takes off. Guy Pearce shows up here as a detective, and there is one terrific scene after another, building up to a Godfather-esque ending (no, not the executing the five families scene. The other one).

7. Toy Story 3
The long-awaited sequel to the most beloved animated franchise finally arrived and didn't disappoint. While it is a bit of a step-backward from the previous entries, Toy Story 3 still delivers on all fronts, equal parts hilarious, thrilling, and heartfelt. The film deals with that inevitable point in a toy's life when their owner grows up and gets more interested in...well, the internet these days. The toy's donate themselves to a daycare center where they feel all will be better, if not for the oppressive cuddly bear that rules over the place. If anything, the film is incredibly nostalgic for me because it brought me back to being a kid again, and remembering playing with my toys and watching these movies. I do not currently know where all my old toys and dolls reside, but the film's ending is an oddly touching scene (an almost-man bids adieu to his playthings) that leaves one with a sense of fulfillment about the Toy Story universe.

6. Another Year
Mike Leigh may be one of the best directors out there no one knows about. I mean, his films are distributed, but most of the people I know have never heard of Leigh. Its a shame because he turns out such terrific films, and writes them in such a wholly unique fashion (lets just say actors work extra hard on his sets) that I'm surprised hes not more widely known. Another Year concerns a happily married couple, Gerri (Ruth Sheen) and Tom (Jim Broadbent), and, well, a year in their life that takes through select days of the four seasons. Its a fantastic study of loneliness and relationships and connections. Really, I don't want to say too much about this film because I went into knowing the bare minimum (the trailer gives nothing away) and came out confident that there are still terrific filmmakers out there.

5. True Grit
Probably the Coens most straight-forward film...ever, this is a fantastic Western, set in the dying days of the West as technology and progress move in and take over. Jeff Bridges is expectedly great as 'Rooster' Cogburn, a role that one John Wayne his Oscar, and Matt Damon as the Texas Ranger is equally impressive. But the real star of the film is newcomer Hailee Steinfeld, who plays the fearless and gregarious Mattie Ross with such verve that she lights up every scene. The simple story of a girl seeking revenge for her father's death is played out through many quiet scenes, punctuated by brief spurts of violence. It's a deeply touching movie, and is bolstered by Roger Deakins stunning cinematography.

4. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
I only liked this movie initially, but like Edgar Wright's other films (Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead) repeat viewings brought this movie to the front of my attention. Its a simple boy-meets-girl story, and plays out much like a musical. Except, instead of musical numbers, fight scenes where our protagonist (Michael Cera) must defeat his sweetheart's seven previous lovers ensue. The film is a hybrid of video games and graphic novels (it is based of such a graphic novel from a lover of video games). The movie is a kaleidoscope of effects that take some time processing, as various texts fly through the scene to accentuate actions. It's absurd and a lot of fun, and though its characterizations are slight (his girlfriend is quite literally the girl of his dreams), its something I never tire of. And those films are just as important as the prestigious ones, right?

3. A Prophet
This foreign film was up for the best Foreign Language Oscar last year, but was not give a real release until February so it counts. A stark, harrowing look at life in prison, as a young Arab is sent there and soon ends up working closely with mafia kingpin stuck inside. The movie kicks off with a fantastic first thirty minutes, in which Malik (Tahar Rahim) must sneak a razor in his mouth to a meeting with a victim and then kill him. Everyone remembers the shot of him, as his mouth bleeds, pulling the razor out. The movie flows seamlessly and is one of the standout films of the year.

2. Exit Through the Gift Shop
I don't think I've every ranked a documentary this high before, but this is that good. It may be in part because the film could be fake (I don't believe Thierry, the frenchmen who is the film's subject, is made up). But one thing is for sure: it gets us close to Banksy, the director of the film, a famously elusive and anonymous street artist whose work includes the guantanamo prisoner at Disney Land and stencils on the West Bank wall. It's about street art, it's about a mad frenchmen who films everything about the movement, and its about how art can be exploited and people are so hungry to grab the hottest item that they'll pay outrageous money for something that isn't necessarily art at all, but imitation. Its definitely one of the finest documentaries, and finest films, I have ever seen.

1. The Social Network
Yes, I know, I know. I have now associated myself with the hive mind of critics out there that declared this the best film. But I have seen it four times and know that there is nothing better this year. The film is about Facebook, and part of what makes it so damn brilliant is how it takes what sounds like the most boring film of the year and makes it the most fascinating. Aaron Sorkin's brilliant dialogue is supported by an exception cast that includes Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield (our new Spider-Man), Justin Timberlake (ironically playing the man that brought down record companies), Rooney Mara (the new Girl with the Dragon Tattoo), and Armie Hammer (playing both Winklevoss twins). From the sumptuous cinematography (shot on the R3D no less), to the perfect editing, to the fantastic and utterly unique score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, there is no other film like this one. It is a film for out time, for our generation, our opportunity to turn to the world and say "Fuck you, I'm CEO, bitch!"

Friday, October 1, 2010

The Social Network (2010)

When David Fincher's latest film (and quite possibly his best) ends, you may wonder what was it about this film that you loved? I find it almost indescribable to tell you what was so wonderful about the film, but let me try and explain.

The movie concerns the invention of the social networking site, Facebook. It is about Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg), his friend Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield), and the various other members who take part in this revolutionary invention. When it was announced two years ago that they were making a Facebook movie, many of us (including myself) scoffed at the notion. How could they make a movie about Facebook? Then when Fincher was signed to direct and Aaron Sorkin, creator and writer of the West Wing, signed to pen the script, many of us breathed a collective sigh.

And they have delivered. I think the film benefits more from Sorkin then from Fincher; his memorable dialogue is what drives every scene, and I would be surprised if this didn't win for Best Adapted Screenplay at this year's Oscars. Of course, Sorkin's dialogue would be nothing if he didn't have a fine cast to embody those words and make their own. And I am not diminishing Fincher's role in all of this; it was his sure hand that guided them through it all to the very finish.

Besides telling the story of how Saverin, Zuckerberg's only real friend, came to sue him for $600 million, the movie meditates on how Facebook has infiltrated our very lives. What made it appealing and different from MySpace or Friendster? Exclusivity. The site was founded solely for Harvard students, then expanded to Cambridge, Yale, and Stanford, and eventually across two continents and farther. When I first joined Facebook four years back, I had to be invited to join (I was only in High School), and it felt like I was being admitted into an exclusive club (I believe it had only recently be opened up to email invitation). Now to sign up is as simple as couple clicks, but then, it was something special.

The movie also does an excellent job of balancing between the invention and meteoric rise of Facebook, and the two depositions, one for Saverin, the other for three Harvard men who had an idea for a site called The Harvard Connection, which Zuckerberg essentially took and made better. These three men, two of the brothers, have a legitimate case, as does Saverin. In fact, from the very first scene, Zuckerberg isn't entirely likable. And I think that's what is amazing about this movie.

We've had unlikable protagonists before, but I think Zuckerberg's portrayal is so poignant because it proves that success and glamour don't go hand in hand, as people would like to believe. Before he invents Facebook, Zuckerberg is nobody, just a computer hacker and programmer (and an excellent one). But after, he gets groupies, and he suddenly becomes the person everyone wants to be friends with. If they spent time getting to know him, they might not like the person they see. The film opens with Zuckerberg on a date with Erica Albright (Rooney Mara, who will play Lisbeth in Fincher's remake of Girl with the Dragon Tattoo), and she says, "You are going to be a successful programmer, and you are going to spend your whole thinking girls won't date you because you are a nerd. And I tell you, from the bottom of my heart, that that is not true. It's because you're an asshole."

The movie cites this incident as Zuckerberg's initial creation of Facebook. If you search Erica Albright Real on Google, you'll return articles contemplating whether this character actually exists or not. In fact, Zuckerberg said the movie plays out a lot like fiction, some of it weighed in fact, of course, but certain events dramatized or invented for the filmmakers benefit.

And I say good for them. My favorite biopic (which this essentially is) ever made is Amadeus (1984), but that movie makes a rivalry between Salieri and Mozart that didn't actually exist in real life. But do I care? No, because the movie plays out with terrific drama and is one of the best movies I have ever seen. If you want straight fact, go find a biography (which I'm sure we'll see one soon about the ACTUAL Zuckerberg story).

Fincher and Sorkin and everyone involved have crafted one of the year's best pictures, and one I eagerly await seeing again. It's a film about our times, about lives. It is also the story of how to skillfully screw your friend out of a business. Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake), the founder of Napster, exclaims to Zuckerberg "This is our time!" Indeed it is.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Se7en (1995)

The following review contains spoilers.  You have been warned.

"Ernest Hemingway once said the world is a fine place, and worth fighting for.  I agree with the second part."
- Det. William Sommerset

So says Det. Sommerset (Morgan Freeman), in voice over, at the conclusion of Se7en, a film that is one of the most gruesome pieces of filmmaking I have ever seen, yet is surprisingly graphic only in the details of the crime scenes.  Had this movie been made today, where we have been desensitized by Saw and Hostel, we might have gotten scenes of the killer actually carrying out these acts of torture, instead of the intelligent mystery that is wrapped around the reason for these killings.

Today, the movie might have opened with John Doe (Kevin Spacey) torturing the gluttony victim, instead of Sommerset and Det. Mills (Brad Pitt) meeting at an unrelated crime scene.  Thankfully David Fincher, who had only been known for Alien 3, defined a very unique style that he would lay out in two other films in which the minds of the insane are explored.  This is still my favorite film he's made, unlike Fight Club (1999), which is entertaining for two viewings, and then becomes overrated with each subsequent observation.

The movie is about a killer who's M.O. is the seven deadly sins as laid out by Dante and observed in many classic books (Canterbury Tales and the Divine Comedies are mentioned frequently).  Sommerset and Mills set-out to try and solve the case: Sommerset is retiring, on his final week, and Mills is new, training to make a difference in the world.

The characters exist in a city that has the look and feel of Los Angeles in the 40s, and the weather of Seattle.  The film bleeds of film noir in every frame, as muted colors, especially blacks and grays, are used throughout the film to establish the somber mood.  Is this movie an allegory of our times, still relevant today?  Definitely.  Sommerset hates living in the city, where petty murders happen a mere four blocks from the police station and are ignored for the higher profile murders of famous lawyers.

The film does a very good job of incorporating the cop buddy cliché into this movie because rarely have we ever seen it used in this setting.  If you think about it, the relationship between the cops isn't any different the relationship between Danny Glover and Mel Gibson in the Lethal Weapon films.  Sommerset is established as very traditional and studious, going to the library to research the seven deadly sins and tying his own ties (a lost art, apparently).  Mills, on the other hand, needs CliffNotes to get through the Divine Comedies, and has all his ties pre-tied for him.  The contrast between the two is very distinct, most obviously in Sommerset's placidity and Mills' yearning to get things done.

A question I kept posing myself throughout the film was why do I like this, and for that matter, why is it so good?  The film is depraved on many levels, but a little depravity probably isn't a bad thing, as long as mature viewers are witnessing it.  But one could argue that the film is merely a slideshow of gruesome acts dressed with classic literature to give it some sense of higher meaning.  The meaning of it all, though, is only evident to John Doe, the crazed mastermind behind it all.

We do enjoy villains who are articulate, who say exactly what they mean to say.  Why else was Hannibal Lecter so appealing?  Kevin Spacey is terrific as the killer, and it is to this movie's credit that he doesn't show up until the last half hour of the film, and that he isn't a raving lunatic.  He is crazy, but like all crazy people he believes he is working for a higher cause, that he was chosen to carry out the acts laid out before him.

"Only in a world this shitty could you even try to say that these were innocent people and keep a straight face.  But that's the point.  We see a deadly sin on every street corner, in every home, and we tolerate it.  We tolerate it because it's common, it's trivial.  We tolerate it morning, noon, and night."  This is how John Doe puts it when asked why he murdered the innocents.  Yes they were imperfect human beings, and so are all of us.  That's John Doe's sermon: our world has gotten so bad that these Seven Deadly Sins are seen by many on a regular, daily basis.  And who can say they haven't experienced gluttony, greed, pride, sloth, lust, envy, or wrath at some point in their lifetime?  I can attest that I have experienced at least gluttony and/or sloth on more then one occasion (those two go together, almost).

As I stated before, there is no real exhibition of actual violence in the film, save one chase scene.  However, the film graphically depicts the violent acts the victims undergo throughout the course of the film, and leaves the actual crime to your imagination.  The crime scenes even help clearly illustrate to you how the crime scene is played out, but the film isn't here for all the gory details.  We don't every see the whore's mangled body, or the disfigured face of the woman, though we do see the fat man, the lawyer, and the drug dealer who has been lying down for a year.

I guess the great irony of the film is that only in a society such as ours could a film like this be considered excellent, a real tapestry of violence and insanity.  Of course, the film is merely an adaptation of the great works of literature it displays in the film.  The Bible is very bloody, as are some of Shakespeare's plays (Merchant of Venice is directly referenced here, and we can thank God John Doe decided not to take note of Titus Andronicus).  Violence has been a natural part of society, from the gladiators to the current spectacle we see depicted on celluloid.

Every year I make a list of top 50 favorite movies I have ever seen, usually to incorporate some new discovery I have made in the past year, or to reorder something I don't particularly agree with now.  On the four lists I have made thus far, I have consistently ranked Se7en as one of my favorites, a couple of times in my top 10.  What makes this movie so sublime, I think, is that every time I watch it I discover something new and yet am able to relive the suspense the first time I saw the movie.  Even though I anticipate that ending, it still makes my jaw drop in horror every time.

Though the final moment of the climax is something I continually agree and disagree with regularly.  The movie has an alternate ending that personally sounds like a better one to me.  Mills has too much time to think about the action he is going to take, and Sommerset just stands there and lets him think about it without physically intervening.  It's a moment that wouldn't happen ever, but as I've said, this movie incorporates the buddy cop formula into a deadly situation.

Ultimately, Se7en is a movie I will always love, despite my minor disagreement with the final moment of the ending.  But it's a film rich with acting, set design, directing, writing, and of course, a killer ass opening credits sequence.  If I ever make a list of the 10 best opening credit sequences of all time, Se7en will definitely be on that list.